1619

Canons of Dort

A Brief Introduction on the Nature of History of the Canons of Dort

Introduction and proof-texts added by the Rev. Daniel R. Hyde

The five Canons (from the Greek word kanon, “rule, law, standard”) of the Synod of Dort are the crown jewel of Reformed Theology.  Here we are plunged to the lowest depths of man’s sinfulness, but are raised up to behold the eternal counsel of God.  Here we see the Biblical balancing act, on the one hand, of the sufficiency of Christ’s death which is to be promiscuously published to all, and on the other, of the sovereign, efficacious grace on the Holy Spirit who applies this infinite merit of the Son of God to the Father’s elect.  Here we see the pain and struggle of the Christian life in this “present evil age” (Gal 1:4) but also our powerful preservation by the hand of our loving Father, despite our sins, unto the end when we reach the Celestial City.  The Canons are filled with many great Biblical themes and characteristics, such as:

First, they are the culmination of the Bible’s teaching on the doctrines of God’s grace towards us in salvation.  The voice of the Holy Spirit can be heard as almost every phrase is saturated with the language of the inspired Scriptures on the crucial themes of soteriology.  What more vital doctrine than that of the grace of God revealed in Scripture can be attacked by the hands of the Devil?  The world?  The flesh?  No other!  Thus the harvest of theology is compiled here for the edification of the believer and the silencing of the scoffer.

Second, they are the most practical and pastoral of all the Church’s historic creeds and confessions.  Unlike most theological writings in their day, the Canons were written in popular language so that all God’s people might understand and benefit from them.  The Church meets the Academy in the Canons as they are no ivory tower discourse, but the doctrine which all believers should confess heartily.  These high doctrines of Scripture are brought down to the level of application upon the most practical problems of the Christian life: the assurance of salvation (I, 12-13, 16; V, 9-13), the ongoing problem of being simultaneously justified yet sinful (V, 1, 4-6), the fate of dead infants of believers (I, 17), the centrality of the means of grace for Christians (I, 14; II, 5; III/IV, 8-9, 17; V, 10, 14), and the imperative of Christian holiness (I, 18; V, 12) to name a few.

Third, they are the production of the first and last ecumenical Reformed Synod.  They are not the opinion of a select few theologians and pastors, but the consensus of 84 delegates gathered from all the Reformed Protestant Churches of Holland, Great Britain, Germany, Switzerland, and France.  For this reason, Protestant Churches of our day, which claim to trace their heritage to the Reformed side of the Reformation must give ear.  This is the Protestant heritage!  This is the Protestant doctrine of salvation!  This is the Evangelical religion!

Fourth, they still speak today just as powerfully as they did in the 17th century as one of our “Three Forms of Unity.”  Each of the five Canons consists of a positive and a negative part, the former being an exposition of the Biblical and Reformed doctrine on the subject, and the latter a repudiation of the corresponding Arminian error.  Thus what we believe as well as what we do not believe is laid out clearly in the Canons.  This powerful clarity is seen as you read the Canons.  Upon doing so, you will notice that there is nothing new under the sun, as the Preacher said (Ecc 1:9).  The same arguments brought against the free grace of God in Christ and applied by the Holy Spirit were brought in the 17th century as they are today.  And Scripture, which does not change but stands forever (Isa 40:8), spoke them as it does now to heretics, schismatics, and the unrepentant.  Thus, the crown jewel of the Reformation faith.

But how did the Canons of Dort come about?  The historical background is fascinating both for its theological and sociological aspects.  Held from November 13, 1618-May 9, 1619 in Dordrecht, Holland, the Synod of Dort was occasioned by the need to respond to the emerging heresy commonly called “Arminianism,” which had sprung up in the Reformed Churches of Holland.  This heresy was being perpetuated by the followers of Jacob van Hermanns, known in English as James Arminius (1560-1609).  Arminius was a very learned and pious Christian who studied under Calvin’s successor in Geneva, Theodore Beza.  After his studies he became a minister in the Reformed Church in Amsterdam in 1588, and then became professor of theology at the University of Leyden in 1603.  His departure from Reformed Protestantism came about as he was attempting to defend the Reformed faith against the proto-Arminian Dirik Volckaerts zoon Koornhert.  Koornhert was influenced by the great Dutch Rationalist and humanist Desiderius Erasmus, who argued for and defended the Rationalistic idea of free will against the great Martin Luther just as Pelagius did against St. Augustine.  Thus this ancient and condemned heresy was revived, and once again was infecting Christ’s Church.  Upon giving up on Reformed Christianity, Arminius and his followers developed the implications of their theology.  Thus they taught that God’s election of sinners was not grounded in His will and love alone but was conditioned by, and based upon, the foreseen faith of sinful men.  They taught that Christ died “universally,” that is, for the sins of every man without limit.  They taught that man was only partially depraved, partially sinful.  They taught that man, by the act of his free will, could resist the grace of the Holy Spirit.  And they taught that no man in this life could have the assurance that he was a child of God, because there was always the possibility of losing one’s salvation.

One such follower of Arminius was the preacher Janus Uytenbogaert (1557-1644), who drafted a set of Arminius’ followers’ beliefs, in what he called the “Remonstrance,” in 1610.  The result of Arminius’ teaching came to be called the “Five Points of the Remonstrance.”  His followers also included the theologian Simon Episcopius (1583-1644), who succeeded him at Leyden.  They were supported by the Dutch statesman John van Oldenbarneveldt (1549-1619) and the scholar Hugo Grotius (1583-1645).  Soon after the five Remonstrants were published, the Reformed responded with the Counter-Remonstrants.  Supporting them was Prince Maurice, who was the leader of Holland’s military.  Thus the interesting developments leading up to the Synod of Dort were more than just theological unrest, but also political and sociological in the land of Holland.

After drafting the “Counter-Remonstrance,” two meetings between the sides ensued, but with no avail as both parties would not budge.  Thus a National, and in fact, International, Synod was called.  The result was the Five Points, now commonly called the “Five Points of Calvinism.”

May the Lord of the Church, once again, grant His people a mighty Reformation for the glory of His name, the edification of His people, and the salvation of multitudes in these last days.

* Scripture abbreviated as normal; HC = Heidelberg Catechism; BC = Belgic Confession

First Head of Doctrine

DIVINE ELECTION AND REPROBATION

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Article 9

Article 10

Article 11

Article 12

Article 13

Article 14

Article 15

Article 16

Article 17

Article 18

Rejection of Errors

Second Head of Doctrine

THE DEATH OF CHRIST, AND THE REDEMPTION OF MEN THEREBY

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Article 9

Rejection of Errors

Third and Fourth Heads of Doctrine

THE CORRUPTION OF MAN, HIS CONVERSION TO GOD, AND THE MANNER THEREOF

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Article 9

Article 10

Article 11

Article 12

Article 13

Article 14

Article 15

Article 16

Article 17

Rejection of Errors

Fifth Head of Doctrine

THE PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Article 9

Article 10

Article 11

Article 12

Article 13

Article 14

Article 15

Rejection of Errors

Conclusion