This Christian Life
R. Scott Clark, D.Phil.Dear Alumni,
Next to The White Horse Inn, one of my favorite radio programs
is This American Life starring Ira Glass. I stumbled across this
show several years ago, and for a while I did not understand
why I was so attracted to it. Glass does not have a classic
"radio voice" (it has been described as "adenoidal"). The
production is good but not extraordinary. Indeed, some of the
stories are completely mundane. For example, they once broadcast
a show recorded over 24 consecutive hours in a local
diner. They edited those American lives to broadcast length,
added a narrative, and voilà —a national radio show.
Sometimes
the topics are even uncomfortable and more than once I have
tuned out. Still, I keep coming back. Why? It is the stories
(they usually have the ring of truth) and the way they are told.
They have a formula and they follow it quite strictly. Every
story has an introduction, characters, tension (dramatic,
tragic, or comedic), a resolution (sometimes unexpected) and an
epilogue.
This formula is not new, so why is it so compelling? I think
it is because humans were created to hear and tell stories, and
it is by a story that we are redeemed and changed. As many
writers have pointed out in recent years, Scripture is a story
and contains stories. In our Christian Mind course we spoke of
"the one and the many." The one great story, which contains
hundreds of smaller stories within it, is the story of creation,
fall, redemption, and consummation.
The word "story" can connote a narrative that is not true or
bears little relation to reality. When I say "story," however, I
do not mean something that is untrue or unhistorical, especially
regarding Scripture. Though true and beyond doubt, Scripture is
nevertheless a story and contains stories.
Presently I am preaching through the gospel of Mark and I'm
influenced by Ned B. Stonehouse, The Witness of Matthew and Mark
to Christ (Philadelphia: The Presbyterian Guardian, 1944). He
was ahead of his time in noticing the way Mark tells his story
of the life, ministry, and death of Jesus. Though true and
historical, the accounts of the healings and of Jesus'
interaction with the disciples and the crowds are stories. The
crowd and the disciples serve Mark's literary purposes as he
paints his fast-moving portrait of Jesus' movement north away
from Jerusalem and then his descent back to Jerusalem and the
cross. For Mark, even geography serves a literary purpose.
The gospel writers were following a well-established pattern.
At the beginning, God walked in the garden with Adam and told
him a story. He told him how he had created everything from
nothing by his powerful Word. He told Adam how he had created
him from the earth and how Adam had it within his power to
experience more than his present life in the garden; that there
was before him a consummate, glorious existence of intimate,
perfect, and endless fellowship with God and man; if only he
would pass one test.
God was, however, not the only one telling stories. Before
Adam, one of God's creatures had decided to tell an alternative
story about a defection to an alternative power, about another
way of life. So Adam had a clear choice between competing
stories.
Tragically, he chose to believe the false story and did not
pass the test and enter into the consummate state. Nevertheless,
despite Adam’s disloyalty, God graciously told him another
story: about the coming long war between the serpent and the
son, which the son would win finally but at great cost to
himself. The original test – the path to the consummate state –
remained to be fulfilled. The promise, however, was that it
would be the son who would pass the test for us.
God repeated the ancient story to Noah, who proclaimed the
impending judgment on all those who had failed the test in Adam
and he proclaimed deliverance for all who believe the story and
the son whom it promises.
Upon entering into a covenant with Abraham, God told him the
story of the son and the serpent, the test and the promise. He
told him about what would be and about what he would accomplish
through him. By grace, Abraham believed the promise of the son.
When Yahweh redeemed his adopted son Israel from slavery and
made him a temporary, national people, he told and re-told the
story of how Israel had been enslaved in Egypt and how Yahweh
had graciously and sovereignly delivered Israel from "the house
of bondage." The whole national existence was premised on that
story. As with Adam, as part of the story, God entered into a
covenant with Israel and gave him a test, not as a condition of
entering the consummate state, but as the condition of remaining
a peculiar national people. If Israel obeyed, the land and its
material blessings would be his. If he did not, however, like
Adam, he too would be expelled and experience curses of equal
magnitude.
Israel's history itself became a part of the great story.
Within it were dozens of stories, some of them tragic, some of
them comic, and many of them sobering; stories about kings and
prostitutes, liars and truth-tellers, the greedy and the
righteous. One of Israel's great sins was that he forgot the
story of God's faithfulness, the promised son, and consequent
test for the land. Like Adam, Israel lived as if he had written
his own story so that he finally received the curses rather than
the blessings.
Of course, like Abraham, some of Israel's children remembered
the test and the promised son. They understood that neither
they, nor Moses, nor David, nor any of the prophets had passed
the test. Those who heard and believed the story lived
gratefully, looking forward to the fulfillment of God's
promises.
Finally, the time for the climax of the story arrived. The
battle raged for more than thirty years as the serpent attacked
the Son repeatedly, sometimes subtly and sometimes violently. A
few times it seemed as if the Son might fail. Indeed, when the
enormity and finality of the test became completely clear and
near to him, he asked if it might be possible for someone else
to undergo the ordeal and finish the story. Nevertheless, the
Son finished the great war and endured the bloody attack until
the end when the battle took its toll. When it was over, a few
of his friends laid his cold body in an even colder tomb.
As you know, however, the story does not end there. The Son
remained in the tomb just long enough. As had been evident in
his life, he was too good for the tomb and too powerful for
death. So he walked out of the tomb, alive and full of life. The
Son was not just Adam's son, as we are; it was he who walked
with Adam and who told the story in the first place. The Son,
who killed the serpent by giving his own life, was the One
through whom all things had been made, God of the same deity as
his Father.
Lots of folk saw him going about and for several days he
explained the story and his role in it. When he finally left, he
sent his Spirit, the third divine person, to equip his friends
to tell the story to others. The Spirit was no stranger. It was
he who had hovered over creation, who had been with the Son in
the garden, who had led the adopted son Israel through the
desert, who had been with him during the long war, and who had,
as it were, gone into that cold, dark tomb to give life again to
the obedient Son.
Now the Son communes with his friends by His Spirit and the
Word he left to them. As it has been since ancient times, the
story of the test and the promise and its fulfillment is still
being told and believed and lived by believers even today.
Like all the characters in This American Life, everyone has a
story with a beginning, middle and an end. Each of those
particular stories finds its significance relative to THE story.
Until and unless, however, they embrace THE story of the Son,
they remain under a test that they can never pass. Those,
however, who believe the story and the Son, begin to experience
some of the blessings he promised to Adam and to Abraham.
Like Ira Glass, we who stand in the pulpit are story tellers.
Our story has a beginning, middle, and an end. At their best,
those stories are pale reflections of THE story. Because we were
created to respond to stories, we who tell stories for a living
should have confidence that God’s elect will be drawn to THE
story itself. We must have this confidence because he who wrote,
told and fulfilled the story has promised to use and bless its
telling.
May the Lord bless our faithful story telling.
R. Scott Clark
Associate Professor of Historical and Systematic Theology Copyright 2005 Westminster Seminary
California, All rights reserved
|
|
The Killer B's: Idols of the Minister’s Heart
Dr. R. Scott Clark
Textual
Variations and Inerrancy
Dr. S. M. Baugh
The Resurrection: Fact or Fable?
Dr. S. M. Baugh
Living Proof
Dr. Derke P. Bergsma
This
Christian Life
Dr. R. Scott Clark
Ventilator Blues
Dr. R. Scott Clark
A Call to
Persevere
Dr. Bryan D. Estelle
Oh, the Formality
Dr. D. G. Hart
The Rural
Church
Dr. D. G. Hart
Enthroned on a Cross
Dr. Michael S. Horton
Why Seminary?
Dr. Michael S. Horton
Holy Passion,
Intelligently Designed
Dr. Dennis E. Johnson
Rediscovering
a Reformation Treasure
Dr. Dennis E.
Johnson
The Call and the
Responsibility
Dr. Hywel R. Jones
Unity
and Division
Dr. Hywel R. Jones
Pagan
Spirituality On the Rise
Dr. Peter R. Jones
A Privilege of
Ministry
Rev. Joel E. Kim
Christ, the
Destroyer
Dr. Robert B. Strimple
Living by Faith
in Fearful Times
Dr. Robert B. Strimple
Christ's Kingdom
in I Samuel
Dr. David M. VanDrunen
|